This however does not help you one whit if the MAINTENANCE required is
Exchange maintenance. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy


Clustering won't help you if your problem is an EDB problem. But,
clustering will help you if (like your original request) you desire
redundancy for the server, the Windows OS, and all processes and
services running on that server.

If you have problems with services stopping, Dr. Watson or Blue Screens
or even intermittent hardware failures, the passive server will fail
over and start your "virtual" Exchange server on the other hardware.

We don't have many problems at all with Exchange or hardware, but where
clustering is really advantageous is when you have to do MAINTENANCE -
such as applying security hotfixes, service packs, or if you're having
problems with a stuck service that requires a reboot. Trigger the
servers to failover and you've got the machine to yourself.

Failovers typically take about 30 seconds. During that time Outlook will
appear to hang, but then (I always recommend Outlook 2002) it will
reconnect to the other server and continue normally.

The cluster manager will also attempt to start services when they've
gone down before they failover - if that's what you want it to do. So,
it's pretty flexible and does a lot for uptime and customer
satisfaction.

Bryan


-----Original Message-----
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy


I didn't even want to go down that path, but you're correct.  You don't
need
clustering if you use good quality hardware and proactive monitoring.

Serdar Soysal


-----Original Message-----
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy


And even if/when you do failover, like when it takes the Trend service a
couple cpu cycles too long to start back up when you're forcing a
pattern
update for klez, your users will still almost definitely notice the
failure,
and you will still get people calling the help desk to ask why.  It's
not
seamless, and in most cases not necessary anyway.

-----Original Message-----
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy


It's still called clustering.

Serdar Soysal


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Redundancy


Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of
having a
redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms
of
user mailboxes etc..)?  Basically i am after failover redundacy,  so 
that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send
and
recive mail. - Is this practical?

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to