All right what does argle mean?

--Felicity
> Argle.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MS Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:28 PM
> Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
> 
> 
> Maybe it's time to go with D or I!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:19 AM
> Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions
> Conversation: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
> Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
> 
> 
> Back in 1998 we used Ed Crowley's employer's line of servers and they
> were
> not that good. We switched to their major competitor. But now it's not a
> competitor anymore since they became the same company. But I still like
> servers that start with C better than those that start with H. But I
> think
> Ed is also from the C side, right?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
> 
> 
> Drop your hardware vendor.  Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed
> Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue.
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
> 
> 
> I apologise for the OT question...
> 
> Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array?
> (hardware RAID)
> 
> I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the
> array it
> is replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error
> right?
> 
> When the RAID5e striping has errors, it registers sectors on the logical
> disk as bad and causes disk I/O errors - which screws (eventually
> corrupts)
> the exchange information store(s) on the logical drive and prevents
> backups
> from completing.
> 
> hhhmmm ... perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why RAID5e couldn't
> handle
> the occassional defunct drive without screwing the rest of the array in
> the
> process of rebuilding itself...
> 
> The hardware vendor has recommended re-creating the RAID array from
> scratch
> and restoring from backup....
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> sorry again for the OT question - but I'll even throw in a Friday
> afternoon
> Haiku for good measure:
> 
> Friday afternoon
> gotta get going home
> server is cactus
> 
> Thanks,
> MP
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to