If you are talking from an Administrative view I love McAfee Groupshield. The interface is far better to deal with and they get their DAT files out pretty quickly. I will admit that Trend and Sophos seem to be a bit quicker, but so far Groupshield has kept me safe.
I agree with you about NAVMSE. It can be difficult to work with in (especially in terms of adding file extension blocks quickly). Hope this helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > ---------- > From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, June 3, 2002 19:31 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MacAfee or Symantec ? > > If you were force to go with one of those 2 company for an antivurus > solution (exchange ), wich one is not too bad ? > > I'm used to antigen and Ihave bad very experiences with NAVMSE. For that > contract the customer must go with one of those solution. > > I never had to sue the MacAfee Ex AV. So wich one you think is not too > bad > ? MacAfee is working well ? > > JF > Do you know if MacAfee is a god AV for server and stations ? (the customer > have 1500 users to protect. Server, stations and Exchange ) > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
