And after it's a released product you'll usually want to wait a couple of revisions before depending upon it!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Siegfried Weber Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there is nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement. <Sig /> > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot of time answering questions about the > amazing E2K WebDav features in Outlook 2002 based on the presentations > given there eh Sig? I don't exactly trust things I read on > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp as gospel either. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html: > > > > <quote> > > The pending announcement is vitally important for Microsoft, because > > the rumors suggest that Kodiak, the next major release of Exchange > > Server, will use Yukon as its store rather than the current > > JET/EDB/ESE storage engine. If that is the case, then Yukon will > > need to handle the extraordinary storage flexibility that Exchange > > Server offers today. </quote> > > > > Read it closely. It doesn't say the next version of Exchange. It > > talks a about a future MAJOR release code named Kodiak. Also note > > that both articles is from 07/08/2001, about a year old! I wouldn't > > count on anything which isn't officially from Microsoft and current. > > > > And of course, these are all rumors unless it is officially > > confirmed in public by Microsoft. So, unless I read it on > > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp I do not believe it > > is true. > > > > Can we now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor mill? > > > > <Siegfried /> > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was > > absolutely > > > stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been > > following this for > > a > > > long time and I though it was a done deal. > > > > > > Please give me your comments on the following links. > > > > > > http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.html > > > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html > > > > > > I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for > > Microsoft to > > hear > > > what they can officially say about this. I know a few who work on > > part of > > > the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which > > you may or > > may > > > not know if very similar to WSS, and is optimized for handling the > > sort of > > > non-rectangular record sets that Exchange has. > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the next > > version > > > > of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine. > > > > > > > > As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the > > source > > > > you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information > > here which > > > > might confuse other people. > > > > > > > > <Siegfried /> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) =20 > > > > > I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL > > Server > > > > will > > > > > be providing the next database engine for the next version of > > > > Exchange. > > > > > And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is > > Yukon. =20 > > > > > Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server? =20 > > > > > TIA > > > > >=20 > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon. > > > > > > > > > > > > William ____________________________________________________ > > > > > > *Titanium* Racing Bikes > > > > > > "Why ride when you can fly?" - William Lefkovics > > > > > > www.airborne.net > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Felicity > > > > Smith > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite > > directions. > > > > > > One from Americans with Disabilities Act which > > requires greater > > > > richness > > > > > > - ie text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - > > greater > > > > > > thinness - ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip > > away > > > > all > > > > > > conten but text, and then compress words for instance > > - removing > > > > vowels, > > > > > > TLA's etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > MIS will now be included with the next version of > > Exchange (code > > > > name > > > > > > Yukon). > > > > > > > > > > > > --Felicity > > > > > > > > > > > > > That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd > > quotes from > > you > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > > I need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13 > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a > > data dump for > > you > > > > . . > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33 > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Iam looking for information on: > > > > > > > 1. Messaging & Collaboration > > > > > > > 2. Unified Messaging > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The type of information I am looking for is on: 1. Why it > > > > > > > is happening (who it is for) 2. Who is making it happening > > > > > > > (vendors) 3. How is it happening (solutions) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking for Articles? Consortiums? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: I've got Technet, so I already have the Microsoft view > > on > > > > this > > > > > > > topic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advanced, > > > > > > > Leonard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > > > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > > > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
