Chris, I checked with the recipient ISP and DNSSTUFF and you're 100% on the money. As soon as I upgrade to Exchange 5.5 and install the latest secutity patches I'll try to get them un-blacklisted.
Many thanks! Dale ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected > The only important part of the message was what the reporting MTA said... > "553 This entry was last confirmed open on 5/26/2002". > > This was probably part (the last line) of a multi-line error message. If you > manually connected from their Exchange server and tried to send an SMTP > message by hand, you'd get the complete error message, which, would I > suspect contain the name of the RBL in use. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected > > Hi Chris, > > Thanks. Is that what the " entry was last confirmed open " means? I've > been trying to decode the "MSEXCH:IMS" message and none of the Exchange > manuals I have are real helpful (by now you probably realize I'm not too > swift when it comes to Exchange!). The system was a mess; I deleted over > 50,000 archived messages, there were corrupted messages in both the in and > out queues, and the Exchange database was riddled with errors. Rerouting > was enabled, wide open. I realize that I need to do some further work to > close everything up tight. The only reason that this mess was discovered > was that the company president couldn't (still can't) send email to his > sister! > > Dale > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:55 PM > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected > > > > According to the error message they still apear to be open, or at least > have > > not been confiormed as closed. I imagine that if you try to send a message > > manually you'll geta bit more infromation about what RBL has them > > blacklisted. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dale Mason > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: 6/10/2002 3:11 PM > > Subject: Re: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected > > > > Yes, Chris I agree. They definitely were, but I think that I closed > > that on > > Thursday. Do they still look open to you? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dale Mason > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:12 PM > > Subject: RE: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected > > > > > > > Congratulations. Your customer is an open relay. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dale Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 9:03 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Exchange 5.0/Mail to specific mailboxes rejected > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > New customer, Exchange 5.0 (upgrade now in works). They have trouble > > > sending email to a few select outside mailboxes. (Just a couple, vast > > > majority of outbound mail delivered flawlessly). I don't see any > > > restrictions anywhere in IMS. They're using the IMS connector only, > > > address space set at "*,1", they're not on any of the relay-blocking > > > lists, etc. I can successfully send to the mailboxes in question from > > > home. They're getting the following response: > > > > > > > Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > > > > > > > Subject: email test > > > > Sent: 6/8/2002 9:28 PM > > > > > > > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > > > > > > > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 6/8/2002 9:28 PM > > > > The recipient name is not recognized > > > > MSEXCH:IMS:CONNEMARA:NTSERVER:NTSERVER 3553 (000B0981) > > 553 > > > > This entry was last confirmed open on 5/26/2002 > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
