Per 1, just using it to illustrate a point. I think the fact that you're acronym impaired, yet otherwise so knowledgeable about Exchange (and many, many other things) was quite illustrative.
Re: Short and mousey.. that was what, 3 years ago? Talk about intensely funny. > -----Original Message----- > From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:18 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > Per 1, I'm completely acronym impaired. And that was what, four years > ago? > > Talk about dead dogs. > > Just call me short and mousey, why don'tcha? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > I must respectfully disagree Mr. Slinger, and not just because you sided > with Mr. Woodruff or because Mr. Willingham is working on the specs for > my > new house. > > Per 1, not knowing an acronym is hardly the same thing as not being > prepared > for class. I didn't chastise Mrs. Koslosky when she saw YMMV in usage > for > the first time and e-mailed me to ask what it meant. Course, I did give > her > a fishing lesson. > > Per 3, 100% might be a bit high, but 78.2% of all statistics are made up > on > the fly. I don't doubt that he has learned a lot from this list and > occasionally dips his toe in. I like to think I do the same. > > Per 4, it might explain why the acronym "DL" was such a foreign concept > to > him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail > is > hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must > say I > was quite startled by its simplicity. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list. You were > > kinda > > expected to know that stuff before you showed up here. But that's > clearly > > shot to hell. > > > > Per 3, bullshit. > > > > Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation. > > > > It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of) > contributions, > > but there you go. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not > > only > > "Exch Admins" but also server double duty by working in other > functions in > > their company. In the case a vice president of a construction > > company...I.E. > > work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler > at > > subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, > > maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a > crappy > > construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as > money > > is > > too tight. > > > > 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a > > bell. > > Have you ever forgotten a person's name? > > > > 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone > > else. > > I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every > once in > > a > > while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. > > > > 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone > walk > > up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and > > forwards, you had no idea it would do? > > > > We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough > > questions because some old superintendent that "knew everything" bit > their > > head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound > > familiar? > > > > Arch > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > How could you not know what a "DL" is? I just thought it was kind of > > weird > > for an Exch Admin not to know that. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:18 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > Nice response...thanks...very helpful > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > Uhhh.... Whats Exchange Server? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > Don't laugh but what's a "DL"? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:24 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > create a DL with all the email addresses, no members and hide it. No > rule > > required. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:16 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > personalmail > > > > > > The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. > Assign > > it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. > > > > Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently > delete > > the > > messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become > > vaporized. > > > > Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. > > > > Scott > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > > > Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that > > ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any > e-mail > > message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill > their > > old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every > > piece > > of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could j > ust > > create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is > there > > some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the > > domain > > is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no > longer > > exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, > all > > of > > the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my > account > > get > > set to "on-hold". What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced > is > > what I would like to do for specific addresses. > > > > Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Arch Willingham > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > -- > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual > or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > ======================================================================== > == > > == > > == > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
