PSTs are horrible as regular mailboxes, but as a filetype for archiving purposes it's really the only way to go.
-Peter -----Original Message----- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST as an archive? On another list I am on it is suggested that outlook mail be archived to .pst files and burned to cd's Is there any good reason to do this? My understanding is that this is not a wise idea and that there are better ways to archive mail stores. It seems that at least once a week someone on this list is trying to deal with a corrupt pst file. Jim Liddil _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
