Please excuse the accidental double negative, I meant to say that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not recommended by the RFC. ;-)
-----Original Message----- From: Ryan Malayter Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:16 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Attn: FAY.COM admin Subject: RE: Attn: FAY.COM admin Actually, it doesn't seem that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not one of the standard mailbox names recommended by RFC-2142. Hostmaster, Webmaster, and a few others should be considered before that. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:45 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Attn: FAY.COM admin Subject: Attn: FAY.COM admin Not only is your content filter set to some ridiculous parameters, but you should ask your email admin to set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. Do an [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a [EMAIL PROTECTED] while you're at it. Jeesh. Nice to get an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] telling me there's no such user in response to an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since whois lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the admin, I'll cc: that, too. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
