You want to learn?  Try twiddling the logging levels and see what
happens.  If I knew of a handy-dandy reference that I could pull out of
my head and give you, I'd have done it.  Not having one, I merely
pointed out that you could very easily determine the answer to your
inquiry.  Had you been doing that instead of whining here, you'd have a
nice handy-dandy reference you could post on the list for the benefit of
the rest of those who might be interested in the same thing.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


The reason I asked was to learn. Some are ok with only knowing "half the
story", others are not.

When I asked in my original post, I just want a link to some type of
document. Guess that was too much to ask for. My mistake.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually
inaccurate.

I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked
with thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this
information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with
regards to monitoring and reporting or something, we could provide you
with a push in the right direction. But at the moment, your post appears
to be nothing more than idle curiosity, in which case "figure it out for
yourself by testing" is a more than appropriate response.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Rojas
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/8/2002 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

I think that an answer of "You know, I have no clue." would have been
better
:)

The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some
testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give
me a partial answer and I am looking for a complete one.

Thanks for the attempt though!

Joe Rojas

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Try them and see.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Hi All,

        I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different
levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange
5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for
all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message
Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log,
and Message
Archival)

Thanks in advance!

Joe Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to