> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 03 October 2002 15:23 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New Exchange Server > > > If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no > big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited > number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 > for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations > store database files; and if no more drive array bays are > available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or > SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space > and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better > performance instead of perceived reliability.
So when your single pagefile drive fails and you decide that because that isn't reliable enough for you, what next, try to put the pagefile on a ramdisk? Now I remember why I like to build all my own servers. Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College >SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0 0 rows returned _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
