Which meant if you had 3 databases on each cluster, the other active node
would fail as soon as it failed to mount one store too many.

That's why MS now pushes a/a/a/p clustering. a/a was an unmitigated
disaster.

(:=

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering


No, according to the theory you can get more users on Active/Active because
both cluster nodes are being used to do something useful. But if one fails,
the other node better be able to take on the load.





-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering


Stay away from active/active.  Go Active/passive instead.  You can get
more users on Active/Passive.

Denny

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Imran Iqbal
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering


We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to Exchange
2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node Active Active
cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or real world
experiences with similar setups.  Each server would have about 800
active users and would probably be connected to a SAN for the shared
storage.

I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup pre SP3.  I
would like to know if there are any other problems and if it is worth
doing

Thanks in advance


Imran

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to