Centrinity is supposed to be coming out with a Linux version of its FirstClass 
e-mail/UM/collab server within a month or so.  It's in beta now.  
http://www.centrinity.com/platforms/linux/



-----Original Message-----
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw@;inubit.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving E2k storage group to new Server


SuSE's OpenExchange server product sounds like a close replacement for a 
Windows e-mail/collabaration server:

http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/index.html



On Wednesday 06 November 2002 16:08, you wrote:
> Here's my take:
>
> A quick peek a CDW shows SBS at $1277
> http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.asp?EDC=274287. Microsoft is
> offering a $500 rebate if you can read the SBS sales literature and answer
> 20 some-odd questions. That puts the price at $777.
>
> I'm not familiar with the MCSP program, so I cannot comment on that. You
> are also forgetting about Exchange CALS at $70 each.
>
> You are correct in that growing past SBS is somewhat painful (I might argue
> with the 10-20 times more expensive. Exmerging 50 mailboxes is not that
> painful...), but I would maintain that if a company finds themselves
> outgrowing SBS, then it should not have been put in in the first place.
>
> Yes, Linux is a viable option for small companies (big ones, too). It does
> have some drawbacks, though.
>
> 1. Support. Finding a local consultant to support a Linux system is going
> to be harder than finding someone to support Microsoft products.
>
> 2. Third-party applications. Going Linux defiantly puts a company outside
> the mainstream and limits third party server applications like mail
> filtering, antivirus, web surfing control, etc.
>
> Running a business on Linux servers is, IMHO, very a very viable option.
> But, it pretty much requires a resident propeller-head to smooth over the
> rough spots. Most small companies (where SBS is targeted) just can't afford
> a full-time system admin. They would much rather farm it out to a
> consultant.
>
> Let's not forget that Exchange is more than email as well. There's nothing
> in the open source arena (that I know of) that can provide the same
> functionality that Exchange provides.
>
> I'll conclude stating that IMHO, SBS is an excellent value when applied in
> the appropriate environment - that is a small company (5-15 employees)
> needing at least file-sharing and Exchange and with no resident system
> admin.
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to