Haven't seen it before. Is SP4 on your radar for the Exchange server in
question?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Luck, Sönke" [mailto:soenkeluck@;kpmg.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> We've had a strange problem this week, maybe anybody has seen a similiar
> thing before. We noticed Outlook clients starting to open Netbios sessions
> over port 139 on two of our Exchange servers. Version used are 5.5 SP3 and
> Outlook 2000.
> 
> Normally Outlook sends a request on port 135 and gets two ports for DS and
> IS access. There are Q articles on this topic, describing how to
> configured
> this ports to be fixed for configurations for access thru firewalls. All
> Exchange servers are configured to use fixed high port numbers 1250 and
> 1251
> for DS and IS access at our site. This works fine for a long time, but two
> servers stopped using port 1251 for IS access a few days ago.
> 
> We worked on this with PSS, and they found a solution - reboot the servers
> ;-))
> 
> What happened? For some reason, that we - and even Microsoft PSS - didn't
> know, on two of our mailbox servers the store process stopped listening on
> port 1251. Outlook uses a fallback and opens a Netbios session on port
> 139.
> Via this connection, all further communication to and from the store is
> routed via the system process on the Exchange Server. This works without
> any
> problems for the clients - as far they can access the server on port 139.
> Under normal circumstances this port is not necessary for client access.
> 
> We checked the registered services on the Exchange Server using
> rpcdump.exe
> and found out that the store is registered correctly on port 1251.
> Connection attempts by the clients are rejected immediately. Stopping and
> starting the store fixes this behaviour. As mentioned before - we
> currently
> don't know how we ran into this situation. All server configuration
> settings
> are correct (and even the same as on all other servers in the site), the
> problem only occurred on one location in a time frame where a lot of
> network
> changes has been done.
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> 
> Sönke Luck
> KPMG Germany - Messaging Team
> 
> 
> --
> Die Information in dieser eMail ist vertraulich und kann dem
> Berufsgeheimnis unterliegen. Sie ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten
> bestimmt. Jeglicher Zugriff auf diese eMail durch andere Personen als den
> Adressaten ist untersagt. Sollten Sie nicht der fuer diese eMail bestimmte
> Adressat sein, ist Ihnen jede Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder
> Weitergabe wie auch das Ergreifen oder Unterlassen von Massnahmen im
> Vertrauen auf erlangte Information untersagt. In dieser eMail enthaltene
> Meinungen oder Empfehlungen unterliegen den Bedingungen des jeweiligen
> Mandatsverhaeltnisses mit dem Adressaten.
> 
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions
> or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions
> expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to