> > OK, this may be a wacky question but have to ask it. > > 1)In an Exchange 5.5 environment, is there anyway to route server to > server traffic through a 3rd party gateway, ie IS->MTA->Sendmail. This > being a strategy to contain viruses on each server by filtering through > Sendmail-Milter.
Any way? Sure. Any reasonable way? Not really. Pick up a copy of Sybari's Antigen or ScanMail instead. I can say the same thing in 20 pages at $200 an hour if necessary. > 2)What's the usual recommendation on when/where to set site boundaries. > Let's say you have a remote location connected by a T1, about 1000 users > in that location all in the same NT domain as the other location. Would > you not want to simplify routing and put them in the same Exchange site. > Or is it generally recommended you put a site connector between remote > geographic sites, even if there is sufficient bandwidth between them to > support RPC. It depends. In general, yes a single site would be better (or more generally fewer sites = good). > Last one, would you not have more flexibility in a E2K site design if you > all start off in a single site, or is it just as easy to deal with > multiple sites. There's not really a 'site' concept in pure E2K. There are admin groups and routing groups. In general, fewer admin groups = good. Routing groups can be modified as needed. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
