In order to pull off what you want to do using milter/sendmail, I'd think
you'd have to make each box a separate site and use the IMS for site
connectivity. That's doable, albiet ugly. For that particular instance, I'd
strongly suggest looking at an Exchange based Antivirus solution - the two
worth considering are Trend's Scanmail and Sybari's Antigen.

Site design is usually a gut feel for me. My personal goal is to create as
few sites as possible - for instance, the last two large scale deployments
I've worked on have used a single site to cover all of North America. In one
case, that was 26 machines connected on a WAN fabric that varied from 384k
to 6Mbps, depending on location. Going on the assumption that there is
reasonable free bandwidth on the T1 mentioned, I'd go single site.

Roger
------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashraph, Elizabeth A. [mailto:liz.ashraph@;mirant.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Site Design
> 
> 
> OK, this may be a wacky question but have to ask it.
> 
> 1)In an Exchange 5.5 environment, is there anyway to route 
> server to server traffic through a 3rd party gateway, ie 
> IS->MTA->Sendmail. This being a strategy to contain viruses 
> on each server by filtering through Sendmail-Milter.
> 
> 2)What's the usual recommendation on when/where to set site 
> boundaries.  Let's say you have a remote location connected 
> by a T1, about 1000 users in that location all in the same NT 
> domain as the other location.  Would you not want to simplify 
> routing and put them in the same Exchange site.  Or is it 
> generally recommended you put a site connector between remote 
> geographic sites, even if there is sufficient bandwidth 
> between them to support RPC. 
> 
> Last one, would you not have more flexibility in a E2K site 
> design if you all start off in a single site, or is it just 
> as easy to deal with multiple sites.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Liz Ashraph
> Messaging Systems Admin               
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to