Insufficient data. > -----Original Message----- > From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a > cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active > was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even > though initially MS told us it could be done, for the > meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was > wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. > We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I > wanted to get some opinions on it first.
_________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
