I'm sorry. I didn't realize asking for additional technical information so that I could answer a question (for free) was ass like behavior. Thank you for clarifying that.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Oh no my only purpose now is to sit on this list and point > out every time you're an ass to everyone. Good thing you > don't keep me waiting long > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for > Send/Recieve on OXP > > > Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I > ought to be doing it by tackling all of those hard technical > questions with gusto and aplomb. But as usual it seems you're > much more inclined to engage in silly banter or name calling. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:13 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Wow.....Chris being a total jerk again. Come on tell me > something new > > :) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, > > Alex > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for > Send/Recieve on > > OXP > > > > > > Your being a total jerk about this question. I don't see > what isn't > > technical about this question. It wasn't a question of what our > > people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't > have to do as > > much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the > nail on the > > head. > > It is creating a technical solution for a non technical problem. > > Isn't that what technology does? I apologize if I didn't > give enough > > detail. > > These users are all on dialup and receive large emails with large > > attachments (pictures mainly) all day. When they go to synchronize > > their inbox it can take up to 2 hours for all the mail to > download. > > The company doesn't want them billing for the time it takes > to sit in > > front of their laptops waiting for it to download. They > would rather > > schedule it at night and just have the rep read it while > they are in > > the field the next day. As far as the question goes here is a > > refresher: > > > > Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP > > that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and > > perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook? Or is there > any third > > party software that would do this. Remember this is Outlook XP and > > the security is different. > > > > All you had to do was post back if you knew something. You > don't have > > to be rude about it. Whether the user is awake or asleep is > > irrelevant all I needed to know is if you knew of anything. > Maybe you > > don't know what a command switch is? I don't know. All I > am looking > > for is something like "Outlook /sendreceive" (obviously > that isn't it > > or I wouldn't be posting this), so that I could put the > switch in the > > scheduled task to run Outlook.exe, setup Outlook to dial if > there is > > no connection, run a send/receive, and be done with it. Or > if there > > was a > > third party app that would do this for me. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:51 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Well, 287677 might work as well depending on what the > actual problem > > to be solved is, but apparently this isn't the week for properly > > phrased technical questions. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:45 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > If I had that, I would have noticed that he wants a scheduled > > > execution of the F5 key, and would have kept my mouth shut. > > > Or perhaps suggested using the sendkeys thingy off the > resource kit > > > (win2000 i think). > > > > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q259103 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted > At: Monday, > > > > November 25, 2002 11:34 AM Posted To: MSExchange > > Mailing List > > > Conversation: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for > > Send/Recieve on > > > OXP > > > Subject: Re: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for > > Send/Recieve on > > > OXP > > > > > > > > > I did, however, ask Santa for the thingy that will read > > email to me in > > > my sleep. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:31 PM > > > Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for > > Send/Recieve on > > > OXP > > > > > > > > > I think once the guy post the actual problem he's trying > to solve, > > > rather than his non-solution to it, it will become clear > > that either > > > BLAT or MAPISEND will solve the problem. > > > But who knows, since he won't give any details. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
