Well... I'm not sure that there is a strict prohibition against using the null sender for mail, but it'd certainly be a bit RFC unfriendly. What if it mapped to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:02 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Doesn't it have to map back to SOMETHING, tho? > > Drew Nicholson > Technical Writer > Network Engineer > LAN Manager > RapidApp > 312-372-7188 (work) > 312-543-0008 (cell) > Born To Edit > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Creating anonymous form > > > I don't believe that the RFCs require the sender address to > map back to > the person who sent the message. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
