Then it would be no different from all the other SPAM we get flooding into our mailboxes....
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 December 2002 16:00 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Creating anonymous form > > > Well... I'm not sure that there is a strict prohibition > against using the > null sender for mail, but it'd certainly be a bit RFC > unfriendly. What if it > mapped to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:02 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Doesn't it have to map back to SOMETHING, tho? > > > > Drew Nicholson > > Technical Writer > > Network Engineer > > LAN Manager > > RapidApp > > 312-372-7188 (work) > > 312-543-0008 (cell) > > Born To Edit > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:59 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Creating anonymous form > > > > > > I don't believe that the RFCs require the sender address to > > map back to > > the person who sent the message. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
