Correct - E2k no longer has an integrated directory, as it uses AD. Optimally, you'd point LDAP clients at a GC server, although I believe any DC would work.
------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection > > > in an Exchange 5.5 no AD environment we just point ours at an Exchange > server that has LDAP enabled on the default port. Have you > tried that or > does an Exchange 2000 server not keep its own copy of a > directory since it > is AD-enabled? I am not sure there . . . > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 12:07 PM > Subject: Re: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection > > > > If memory serves, you have to import a bunch of stuff into > your Active > > Directory: new objects and things to support the HP unit. > It may have even > > gone as far as modifying your schema (can't be sure on that). > > > > When we realized what was involved, we backed off in a hurry. That's > mostly > > due to lack of confidence (our AD setup was quite new at > the time), and a > > lack of any defined business need. All agreed that "it > would be nice to > > have", but then agreed that affecting the entire > organization to benefit > one > > department was a risk we didn't need to take. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:08 AM > > Subject: HP Digital Sender LDAP Connection > > > > > > > Has anyone used an HP 9100C Digital Sender connected to > Active Directory > > > before? I cannot get the darn thing to work. I have all all the > > > parameters correct, but get "No matching entries found" > when I do a > > > search. I have the correct port (389), the correct IP of > the GC server, > > > and the search root is set to (DC=domain,DC=com). If > anyone has any > > > insight on this, I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a > hamburger today. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
