Try more lubricant. IIS5 is better at handling Exchange5.5 OWA than IIS4 was... if in fact that was the question...
William -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Mongo head hurt. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:34 PM Subject: RE: Planning OWA > Do you recommend a W2K server C with Exchange 5.5. Running IIS5 and OWA > products? > > Tony > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Planning OWA > > > Any way you can get to W2K? It's a far better OWA product. > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Planning OWA > > > I need some tips on this layout on Exchange Org. > > Server A > NT4 sp6 > Exchange 5.5 sp3 (all mail boxes) > > Server B > NT4 sp6 > Exchange 5.5 sp3 ( Internet Mail Service ) > IIS3 > > I like to know if this will work. I plan to in stall IIS4 and OWA on > server B. I like to hear from everyone thoughts and comment. > > Thank You > Tony N. > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
