I've got it on 5 mailbox servers with stores up to 35GB without issue as
well.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
> 
> 
> Will do.  I've been running the ESE v3.8 scanner on a small 
> sites server for
> around a year now, never had any problems, but then there's 
> only a 2gb store
> and about 40 mailboxes.  
> 
> I guess I'm trying to do "best practice" as I'm effectively 
> going to be
> starting from scratch with these new boxes.
> 
> Oh, and I'm talking crap, I do have a v5 client CAB files, I haven't
> installed it (still don't know if I should or not!), but I've 
> extracted the
> exchng32.exe and it's version is 5.0.1457.3.
> 
> regards,
> Paul
> --
> Paul Hutchings
> Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]    
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 13 February 2003 13:24
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc]
> > 
> > 
> > Could you let me know about what Trend states about the 
> AVAPI and ESE
> > scanner?  we still run the avapi and have not really seen the 
> > requirement to
> > upgrade to ese...however, it would be nice to get more 
> > detailed info when
> > viruses are found...and I also understand that the ese does 
> > not reset the
> > "mailbox accessed" each time it performs a manual scan.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Dave Stevens
> > -IT Network Support- 
> > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 865-576-8898
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:16 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
> > 
> > 
> > OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I 
> > guess that
> > equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server?  
> > 
> > I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just 
> > struck me as the
> > sort of thing that might crop up further down the line...
> > 
> > I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail 
> > mapi/avapi vs.
> > Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft 
> > support issues
> > with ESE scanners?
> > 
> > regards,
> > Paul
> > --
> > Paul Hutchings
> > Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> > Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]    
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on 
> your Exchange 
> > > server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange 
> > > server version.
> > > 
> > > Brian
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul
> > > Hutchings
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't 
> appear twice as 
> > > well!
> > > 
> > > One thing just occurred to me.  What's the consensus on 
> > having a Mapi 
> > > client installed on the Exchange server?  It's the sort of 
> > thing that 
> > > I could imagine might be required at some point down the 
> > line, so I'm
> > > wondering
> > > if
> > > it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange?
> > > 
> > > Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as
> > > Windows 2000
> > > doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK?
> > > 
> > > regards,
> > > Paul
> > > --
> > > Paul Hutchings
> > > Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> > > Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]    
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paul Hutchings
> > > > Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get
> > > > this right
> > > > first time :-)
> > > > 
> > > > I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to
> > > migrate the
> > > > existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM).
> > > > 
> > > > The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the
> > > > following:
> > > > 
> > > > Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode
> > > > IIS removed
> > > > IE6 SP1 installed
> > > > Relevant Critical Updates
> > > > Exchange service account in local admins group
> > > > Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc..
> > > > Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring..
> > > > 
> > > > These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third
> > > > party software
> > > > will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of 
> > the boxes.
> > > > 
> > > > Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and
> > > > get going, but I
> > > > guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything 
> > > > obvious that
> > > > I've forgotten?
> > > > 
> > > > regards,
> > > > Paul
> > > > --
> > > > Paul Hutchings
> > > > Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
> > > > Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 
> > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to