No-one has every hacked my employer's website either. I think this
demonstrates patching the web server is a waste of time, so I shall stop
doing that.

Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps.
Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 05 March 2003 17:38
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
> 
> 
> 
> Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with 
> some real world 
> examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO 
> message told the 
> world they were away?  I think I am more likely to be 
> burglarized by a 
> neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my 
> postbox has been 
> emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train 
> tickets, etc.
> 
> This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend 
> debunking site, Snopes.  
> The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm 
> 
> I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this 
> happening.
> 
> Cheers,
> Allison
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote:
> > The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small.  However, consider the
> > following:
> >
> > Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south 
> of France 
> > until the end of the summer.  Please feel free to drop by 
> his house at 
> > 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever 
> is left.  
> > If you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox!  Tell your 
> > friends!
> >
> > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Byron Kennedy
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: OOO to internet, still bad?
> >
> >
> > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. 
>  Is this 
> > still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" 
> available 
> > out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service 
> effectively 
> > with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past?
> >
> > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds?
> >
> > Thx for ideas... byron
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to