So it's your assertion that it takes more effort to sniff the wire than to
sniff traffic on a box one may or may not have access to initially. Doesn't
sound right on the face, but not sure it's worth arguing about.

On 3/24/03 8:25, "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The difference is that it isn't being relayed through my ISP's mail servers.
> Therefore, to my ISP, its just another set of traffic on the wire. By it
> passing through a third party mailer, by definition it must be stored before
> being forwarded. That's enough of a difference to matter, IMO.
> 
> It is still "in the clear" so its susceptible to snooping. It just requires
> more effort to do, and that effort delta is definitely non-zero.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:08 AM
>> To: Exchange Discussions
>> Subject: RE: postini spam control
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, at 11:40am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> No one gets my MX records but me. Period. There's too much
>> marginally 
>>> confidential information crossing email these days to make that a
>>> practical solution for all byt the smallest shops.
>> 
>>   The thing is, cleartext email being sent over the Internet
>> is insecure anyway.  Your ISP (or their ISP, or the other
>> end's ISP, or ...) doesn't need to be the MX to snoop your
>> mail.  The data is already flowing through their network.
>> Don't get me wrong; the problem of confidential information
>> being sent in email is a real one.  But the "run your own MX"
>> thing just seems like you're giving yourself a false sense of
>> security.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the
>> author and do  
>> | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or
>> organization. |
>> | All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
>>            |
>> 
>> 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to