A decentralized PGP implementation (a generally bad idea... and imperfect at best ) doesn't particularly does it?
On 4/3/03 18:36, "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM > Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange > > >> Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing >> Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a > number >> of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at > KMS. >> Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a > solution >> like PGP. Finally, engage MCS's government consulting unit (or similar > unit >> from $one_of_a_few_consulting _shops) to discuss the implementations used >> for DMS. >> >> On 4/3/03 16:28, "Orin Rehorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for > high >>> security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if > even >>> the admin couldn't see their e-mails. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Orin >>> > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
