That's OK. I consider every email from you a waste of time.
-----Original Message----- From: David Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions hehehe... Yahoo thought this email from Ed was spam... --- Ed Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've considered becoming a lawyer because I could then criticize > lawyers with standing. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > Um, whereas I'm considering studying law now just for the hell of > it... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:43 > To: Exchange Discussions > > We are so happy that you've recovered from your bout of insanity. > > John Matteson > Geac Corporate ISS > (404) 239 - 2981 > Atlanta, Georgia, USA. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Midgley, Ian > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:16 PM Posted To: > Exchange Discussion > List > Conversation: Monitor Email content > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > LOL. I nearly became a lawyer in my younger days and I just miss it. > Now let's see - how's that restore coming along? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Henderson Richard > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 June 2003 16:11 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > yawn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Midgley, Ian > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to > read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in > place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way > you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you > should do without contravening your terms of employment. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Slinger, Gary > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other > side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the > given company. And a few other things. "It depends". > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Midgley, Ian > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 > To: Exchange Discussions > > I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. > Give me an example of > anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined > below would be legal? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Slinger, Gary > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > "The emails might be the companies property but who > is allowed to read them > is a different thing altogether." > > Don't confuse your opinion with established law. > This is a whole mess of > "it depends". > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Midgley, Ian > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 > To: Exchange Discussions > > Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) > coz she dating a bloke in > the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and > asks if she can read > all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I > read his emails at the > same time? What's my defence when he files a claim > against me for emotional > trauma when both his girl friends dump him? > > I just don't want to go there. > > The emails might be the companies property but who > is allowed to read them > is a different thing altogether. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Monitor Email content > > > not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that > email is company property. > A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is > not required to read > employee email . . . > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Midgley, Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM > Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > > > > Before you start looking at your users mail ensure > that you have an > > email policy defined and that all your companies > employees know what > > it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held > responsible for invading > > someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you > have to have reasonable > > > grounds to > do > > this sort of thing. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Terry Hines > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Monitor Email content > > > > > > I have been tasked with reviewing the content of > employee email. What > > is > the > > best method? > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang > === message truncated === _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
