Those aren't holes. One can legitimately accept mail for those addresses and as long as it isn't relayed to the final destination the server is relay secure. The designers of those tests have implemented their testing criteria improperly.
-----Original Message----- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:23 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Open Relay Suggestions Subject: Open Relay Suggestions I am using Interscan Virus wall as my incoming smtp server on port 25; which then forwards my mail to the Exchange IMC on port 6000. I have been testing against open relay testers and I always fail the one or two tests where they spam my domain name. I am assuming this is because Interscan cannot look up usernames to see if the mailbox is valid? For that matter I dont think Exchange 5.5's IMC does either? Anyway to close this last hole? Suggestions? I worked hard to get off all the RBL's the last mail admin had gotten us on . . . tia chris >>> RSET <<< 250 web3: Reset State >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <<< 250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender Ok >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <<< 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient Ok _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
