There's generally at least a little more information on the NDR than you're
getting. Any way you cut it, however, the issue is there end, not yours.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
> 
> 
> Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very
> unimformative)
> I guess it would be more approiate to call it a Dilvery 
> delayed report,
> we never receive and actual NDR and the recipient never receives the
> message.
> 
> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
> 
> THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
> 
> YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
> 
> Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed.
> 
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
> 
> 
> Seeing as Casey has butchered the NDR's its nearly impossible to tell
> what's actually happening.
> 
> However, its not *completely* impossible. penncolor.com *is* 
> delivering
> the mail, and the reject is coming from their end:
> 
> > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com 
> > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender))
> 
> Their Exchange (I presume) server (exbdc01.kpafilms.com) is rejecting
> the mail from their mail relay (mail.kpafilms.com), as is clearly
> spelled out by this slice of NDR.
> 
> And, in this case, the fix is the same for Ex 5.5 and for E2k 
> - beat the
> foreign postmaster about the head and shoulders with a 2x4 until they
> fix their mail issues.
> 
> Roger
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:52 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
> > 
> > 
> > For some reason, it would appear that your mail server is 
> delaying the
> 
> > message, instead of trying the next highest MX record.  
> Having two MX 
> > records, with the first being unavailable, is common practice (at 
> > least in the *nix world), where the higher-level MX is an SMTP 
> > gateway.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I can't tell you how to fix this, I'm still on Ex5.5.
> > 
> > Steven
> > ---
> > Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Network Administrator
> > The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:48 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: misconfigured sender
> > 
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Server is E2K
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 
> > My company is having problems sending mail to another 
> company (simply
> > put)
> > 
> > NDRs received state the following:
> > 
> > "Deliver to the following recipient has been delayed."
> > 
> > The NDR is received days after being sent.
> > 
> > I've verified that I can send to the other company from an account 
> > outside of our domain (hotmail for example)
> > 
> > The message header received from the other company when
> > sending mail to
> > us looks as follows:
> > 
> > [SNIP]
> > Received: from exbdc01.kpafilms.com 
> > mail.kpafilms.com[12.155.200.200](misconfigured sender)) [SNIP]
> > www.dnsreport.com shows that the domain has 2 MX records and 
> > the primary
> > is unreachable.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > [SNIP]
> > 10  mail.kpafilms.com.
> > 5  mi.kpafilms.com.
> > 
> > ERROR: I could not connect to one or more of your mailservers:
> > mi.kpafilms.com: Timed out [Last data sent: QUIT ]
> > [SNIP]
> > 
> > Question:
> > 
> > Is there anything I can do on my end to allow this mail to 
> go through?
> 
> > I suspect that something has changed on the other company's end 
> > because until the 25th of June, we had no problems sending to them.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Casey
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to