The new patch, which is rolling out via WSUS this week. If that doesn't work, I'll remove the old ones.
I'd certainly never heard of it either. It's in the top 3 strangest things I've see this year. I now must apologize to the users - I thought fer sher that it was user error, and told them as much. Kurt On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > The new patch? > > Or removing the old ones? > > Thanks for this. I'd never heard of it. The "long file names" must play a > strong piece of the puzzle. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 5:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Exchange] Re: Problem with attachments > > Confirmation - this is not an hallucination: > http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-outlook/outlook-is-mixing-up-attachment-file-names/7da90c68-2ec7-4363-997f-337e0d9a6010/?auth=1 > > I finally have an answer, I think I'm going to try the suggested solution. > > Kurt > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote: >> Exchange 2010, fully patched, and a mix of 2010 and 2013 clients. >> >> I've had 4 people from our UK office complain that sometimes when >> sending email with attachments, the recipient (internal or external) >> either gets the wrong file, or if the email contains more than one >> file, some or all of them will have the names switched with the other >> attachments. >> >> I put it down to incompetence for a couple of them (based on past >> episodes), but the latest person to complain is new, and it's now >> gotten to the point that I can't ignore it any more. >> >> Has anyone heard of such a thing? Any ideas on what might be happening? >> >> In this latest complaint, I've also received a screen shot of a blank >> email. By blank I mean that all I see is the ribbon across the top, >> the Send button, the To button and the name of the recipient. No >> subject line, no message, though at the bottom there is notation of an >> attachment. >> >> This is one of the oddest things I've ever run across. I'm not finding >> anything after some SFTW, either. >> >> Help anyone? >> >> Kurt > >
