Not sure how that is an improvement, but there you go. Working as intended.  ☺

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Exchange] Re: Problem with attachments

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3085604

Improvements and fixes

  *   ...
  *   When you save an email message that contains many attachments with long 
names in Outlook 2010, the names of the attachments are changed and switched.

--
Espi


On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Kurt Buff 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Confirmation - this is not an hallucination:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-outlook/outlook-is-mixing-up-attachment-file-names/7da90c68-2ec7-4363-997f-337e0d9a6010/?auth=1

I finally have an answer, I think I'm going to try the suggested solution.

Kurt

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Kurt Buff 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Exchange 2010, fully patched, and a mix of 2010 and 2013 clients.
>
> I've had 4 people from our UK office complain that sometimes when
> sending email with attachments, the recipient (internal or external)
> either gets the wrong file, or if the email contains more than one
> file, some or all of them will have the names switched with the other
> attachments.
>
> I put it down to incompetence for a couple of them (based on past
> episodes), but the latest person to complain is new, and it's now
> gotten to the point that I can't ignore it any more.
>
> Has anyone heard of such a thing? Any ideas on what might be happening?
>
> In this latest complaint, I've also received a screen shot of a blank
> email. By blank I mean that all I see is the ribbon across the top,
> the Send button, the To button and the name of the recipient. No
> subject line, no message, though at the bottom there is notation of an
> attachment.
>
> This is one of the oddest things I've ever run across. I'm not finding
> anything after some SFTW, either.
>
> Help anyone?
>
> Kurt


Reply via email to