That wasn't pre-ISA?
-----Original Message----- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing If this is true, then why does Microsoft themselves use UNIX for their SMTP firewalls? But we digress away from the charter of this list. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -----Original Message----- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing I agree - without exception. -----Original Message----- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing NT Servers can be just as secure as Unix servers, if you apply the proper patches. You do apply the proper patches, don't you? -- Drew ******************************** Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! TEN THINGS YOU CAN DO TO PREVENT WAR http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11597 -----Original Message----- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing Are you sure you want to put NT machines on the firewall? Shouldn't there be UNIX machines there for better security? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -----Original Message----- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange SMTP Routing Currently we run; List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
