NAV CE has a better mechanism, I feel... --- "Crouthamel, Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you utilize centralized management with Trend? ie > updating desktops via a > console. I guess my question is, does Trend have a > similar product to NAI's > EPO? > > Thanks for the info...After all these threads its > been narrowed down to two > products. > > Jonathan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Moody, Jacqueline > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:24 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > > We also started with NAI and had a lot of problems > with it. The desktops > defaulted to checking mapped network drives, which > slowed some logons down > to a crawl. We now have Trend deployed throughout > the enterprise (165 site > WAN, 400 servers, 20,000+ workstations, Exchange) > and are very, make that > extremely happy with it. For Exchange, I wouldn't > look at anything other > than Trend or Antigen. > > Jackye > > -----Original Message----- > From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [ > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:16 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > We currently use NAI products (unfortunately). I > have been looking into > antigen as an alternative when our licenses come up > for renewal. A quick > perusal on Trend's site shows that they also offer > file server as well as > desktop protection options. Has anyone used these > other products and how > have you found them? That was the one and only thing > I liked about NAI, > getting all the needed products from one vendor. > > Jonathan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob t. Berge [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:12 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > Thanks!! :) > > PS: Ignore my last post, especially the Antigen > part, I read newer posts and > found the answer I was looking for ;) > > Thanks for that Mich�le!! > > Bob > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: Neil Hobson [ > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Verzonden: donderdag 13 december 2001 10:03 > > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Onderwerp: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > > > > IIRC = If I Remember Correctly. > > > > AFAIK, this is the best site for this: > > > > http://www.acronymfinder.com > <http://www.acronymfinder.com> > > > > Neil > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bob t. Berge [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Posted At: 13 December 2001 08:51 > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > Conversation: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > > > > First of all my appologies for not understanding > what IIRC means. > > Second, I've been through every option in Antigen > and i canNOT find > > ANY way to ignore zipfile contends. So, if you DO > have that option > > then please be so kind and enlighten me. > > > > Thank you very much in advance, > > > > Bob > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > > Verzonden: woensdag 12 december 2001 17:13 > > > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Onderwerp: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > > > > > > > IIRC, you can configure Antigen to ignore the > contents of zip files. > > > > > > -Mich�le > > > Immigration site: < > http://LadySun1969.tripod.com > <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> > > > > The Miata: < > http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley > <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> > > > > Tiggercam: < http://www.tiggercam.co.uk > <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > "The one function that TV news performs very > well is that when there > > > is no news, we give it to you with the same > emphasis as if there > > > were." -David > > > Brinkley > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bob t. Berge [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:15 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: Antigen vs. ScanMail > > > > > > > > > Here's my 2 EUR cents about these 2 > applications. > > > > > > I installed Antigen on one server and ScanMail > on another (yes i got > > > it working after i applied SP2 for Ex2k). > > > From what i've seen so far, neither one has the > ability to block *.* > > > except *.zip, for example. You have the choice > to either block ALL > > > attachments without exception, or block only the > files with the > > > extensions you provide. A point extra goes to > Antigen for not just > > > looking at the extension but also checking the > file's > > headers to make > > > sure a .jpg isn't in fact a .exe. > > > But ScanMail gets the extra point for the option > to set how deep > > > compressed files should be checked for filtered > extensions, > > hence give > > > you the option to ignore zipfiles(!), unlike > Antigen, which > > > removes the > > > filtered extensions from compressed files also. > > > > > > The viruschecking part of both apps seem to be > thorough and good. > > > > > > I think i'm gonna use ScanMail instead of > Antigen on our main Ex2k > > > server though, Antigen is good but i am missing > a few features that > > > ScanMail does have. > > > > > > Well I just wanted to let you all know what I > think about > > em, do what > > > you want to do with the info ;) > > > > > > Now i could use a nice cold beer, preferably > Palm === message truncated ===
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
