An external sender would need some SMTP address, right?  Internally, you can
forward that wherever you want.  I'm not sure what application this would be
beneficial for.

In Exchange2000, you can create a silly SMTP address.  In fact a mailbox
requires some SMTP address in order to function.  This could be the patented
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  If someone knows this name, they can send to the
mailbox.

William 


-----Original Message-----
From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: forwarding question


The SMTP address, you can't send from the internet to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] because it is not a registered domain, the
address wouldn't be resolved.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: forwarding question


I am not certain what you are asking.

>>They don't want to make the internal mail server addresses public

The sender would need to know, right?  Do you mean the SMTP addresses or the
IP addresses?


-----Original Message-----
From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: forwarding question


Hello all, I'm fairly new to the exchange administration
I was asked if it is possible to (i.e. make it work) set up Exchange 5.5 to
forward an email sent to one address to another completely different email
address on a non-public email server. 
I did it by creating a mailbox on my exchange server setting it to use an
alternate recipient which I set as a custom recipient that I created
pointing to the internal mail address
Ex. external customer emails [EMAIL PROTECTED] - the MSexchange server
receives the message in the root mail box, the root mailbox has an alternate
recipient which is a custom recipient that I created of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They don't want to make the internal mail server addresses public so that is
not an option. I need to know if there is any other simple way of doing it,
something I have overlooked. This works and is fine to manage for 1-10 email
addresses but once there are 500+  different addresses it may get very
confusing, especially if someone new has to come in and administrate it. I
thought that maybe there is something built into exchange 5.5 for this. If
this is a feature of E2K it would be nice to know, maybe I can get them to
spring for an upgrade.

Michael Yurchuk MCSE NT4.0
direcTEL
Saskatoon, SK
S7K 0X8

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to