Title: Message
>>Really? I have never heard that.
 
It's only at the very front of almost every single document/book/whitepaper ever written in regards to Exchange 2000 deployment and migration.
 
For example: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradeguide.asp
 
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration

Really? I have never heard that.

Why is upgrading to SP3 such a problem? I insist on mine running SP4. I reinstall the SP every time a change is made as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration

You need AD running before you can install Exchange 2k

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 migration


All:
We are a small business, 1 exchange server/PDC and 1 BDC all NT4 at this
point We are slowly moving to win 2000 and our first task is to upgrade to
exchange 2000 on a new machine from exchange 5.5 (on nt4 sp6).I have read
you need to be on sp3 of exchange 5.5 in order to migrate. Is this true
and if so can anyone tell me why? This just adds another complication to
the process which I really dont need.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Dennis

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to