David, the error that you clipped had nothing to do with SPF. On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where do I check my SPF records? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:40 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Rejected Email > > Check to be sure your own SPF records are in order, and contact the > email administrator at that domain and find out what it is about those > emails his server doesn't like. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:24 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Rejected Email > > I have users that just started reporting this very issue this week! What > does this mean I need to do? > ------------------ > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report > a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, > contact your system administrator. > < outbound4-sin-R.bigfish.com #5.0.0 X-Postfix; host > mailgate.vanderbilt.edu[129.59.4.20] said: 550 5.7.0 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Local Policy Violation (in reply to MAIL > FROM command)> > ----------------------------- > > Dave Lum - Systems Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025 > "When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:33 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Rejected Email > > SenderID PRA: That's a reference to SPF records. "not permitted" > tells me that the likely issue is that the sending source and the what > is allowed in the SPF record to not match. > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Brown, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > We are continually having Newsletters rejected because of the > anti-spoofing > > features on our Edge Transports. > > > > > > > > I have placed the IP address of the sending server AND of the domain > of the > > return address in the IP Allow List. Frankly, I don't know what else > to do > > to get these newsletters in to our domain. (This isn't something I > need to > > restart the Transport Service for, is it?) > > > > > > > > Here is the relevant part of one log entry from the Agent Logs: > > > > 4,Sender Id Agent,OnEndOfHeaders,RejectMessage,550 5.7.1 Sender ID > (PRA) Not > > Permitted,Fail_NotPermitted, > > > > > > > > We are running Exchange 2007, CCR with two Edge transports. We have > NOT > > upgraded to SP1 yet. > > > > > > > > Larry C. Brown > > > > LAN/WAN CS Support > > > > Dayton Power & Light > > > > (937)-331-4922 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > ME2 > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > ************************************************************************ > ************************** > Note: > The information contained in this message may be privileged and > confidential and > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the > intended > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this > message to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If > you > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately > by > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > ************************************************************************ > ************************** > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >
-- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
