Ahhhh, did someone say that ME2 SUCKS???? JK ME2.  :-)

 



-----Original Message-----
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rejected Email

Thanks ME2...sucks...something must have changed with our ISP, more than
one org we send to is having this issue all the sudden.

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands"


-----Original Message-----
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Rejected Email

The bit that you copied in your e-mail says:

``````````
550    5.7.0
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Local Policy Violation (in reply to MAIL
FROM command)>
``````````

5.7.x status codes indicate an issue that relates to security and/or
policy.  The Verbose text says that its a "Local Policy Violation" in
relation to the the "MAIL FROM command", which tells me that they have
a policy (perhaps anti-spam related) that did not like who the message
was coming FROM (aka your user).

You may have triggered something in the recipients spam filter
directly, or you may be on a black list (DNSBL).  DNSBL rejections are
typically more specific about which DNSBL provider list rejected you -
but they don't have to.

In any event, someone from your org needs to talk to someone from the
recipients org and find out exactly why you are being rejected.



On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:23 PM, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have users that just started reporting this very issue this week!
What
> does this mean I need to do?
> ------------------
> The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not
report
> a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it still
fails,
> contact your system administrator.
>            < outbound4-sin-R.bigfish.com #5.0.0 X-Postfix; host
> mailgate.vanderbilt.edu[129.59.4.20] said: 550    5.7.0
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Local Policy Violation (in reply to MAIL
> FROM command)>
> -----------------------------
>
> Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
> "When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:33 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>
> Subject: Re: Rejected Email
>
> SenderID PRA: That's a reference to SPF records.  "not permitted"
> tells me that the likely issue is that the sending source and the what
> is allowed in the SPF record to not match.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Brown, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > We are continually having Newsletters rejected because of the
> anti-spoofing
> > features on our Edge Transports.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have placed the IP address of the sending server AND of the domain
> of the
> > return address in the IP Allow List.  Frankly, I don't know what
else
> to do
> > to get these newsletters in to our domain. (This isn't something I
> need to
> > restart the Transport Service for, is it?)
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is the relevant part of one log entry from the Agent Logs:
> >
> > 4,Sender Id Agent,OnEndOfHeaders,RejectMessage,550 5.7.1 Sender ID
> (PRA) Not
> > Permitted,Fail_NotPermitted,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are running Exchange 2007, CCR with two Edge transports.  We have
> NOT
> > upgraded to SP1 yet.
> >
> >
> >
> >  Larry C. Brown
> >
> >     LAN/WAN CS Support
> >
> >  Dayton Power & Light
> >
> >         (937)-331-4922
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ME2
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>
>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>



--
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to