Nickname files are great for that, aren't they:). I think DG's always expand on a GC. At least in cached mode and go to work offline I can't get them to expand....
Have you got more than one GC and someone's not updating?is the client pointing to the same one as ESM? Blackberry ________________________________ From: Miller Bonnie L. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Fri Jul 10 10:07:42 2009 Subject: RE: All Staff DL and 1 User.. Try deleting your memorized nickname entry in Outlook and then try again, letting it resolve from the GAL. ve seen nickname file entries stick like this where they dt update if a list has been deleted and recreated with the same name. -Bonnie From: Harry Singh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: All Staff DL and 1 User.. Thanks Guys. But what i actually noticed, which is strange and may actually be an AD issue is the following: The "ALL Staff" DL has 3 nested groups. Main SiteA SiteB The user is a member of main. When I collapse the + sign for All staff in outlook, i don't see the user's name listed at all. I check the DL and i see the user added to the main DL, but his name just doesn't appear. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Sorry, that didn't come through very well (and sorry for the spelling too) The munged addy would be something like this (which will hopefully come through this time) in the property box. Don't know if you saw it or not, my server/outlook yanked it out of my original message... eSs-eMm-Tee-Pee:[email protected] I should note, the few times I've seen addys like this I did find them in ESM in an undeliverable queue Blackberry ________________________________ From: [email protected] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thu Jul 09 17:20:38 2009 Subject: RE: All Staff DL and 1 User.. if message tracking doet show delivery to the mailbox I dt think it would have anything to do with Outlook. If the delete read dit work the first time it probably wont (provided if you had multiple Gs they had time to replicate) If you put the DL in an address field, Click the + sign to expand, Find his name and double click i Does the Property Pane look normal (i.e. the same as a user who gets the message)ve seen a recipient get munged up and the property pane looks more like an internet email property pane and the email address is some kind of garbage that looks similar to this- If the address looks �� You said- Combining through message tracking doesn't show a Message Delivered Locally to Store for this user. I know it didt show delivered by can you track From: the sender and see if a copy even sent to the recipient? Somewhere there should be some kind of NDR or kickback From: Harry Singh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: All Staff DL and 1 User.. Thanks for the tips. The remove and re-add has probably been done over 5 times but to no avail. I have to inspect the user's outlook deeper, because i've looked at the rules and haven't seen anything offending. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: That happened to us a few days ago- it was a convoluted Outlook rule the user disavowed any knowledge of. ve had a delete re-add work too. [1]if See if he has any Outlook rules that might be doing something to the message [1] Go into message tracking and see if s being delivered to his mail box [3] if not, delete him from the Group, OK out of it, go back and add him. From: Harry Singh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: All Staff DL and 1 User.. All -- I have an ALL Staff DL that contains 3 nested DL's which, obviously, consists of All Staff who are e-mail active. I have 1 user who does not receive e-mails when addressed to this list (and another DL as well, but i imagine the cause and possible solution is one in the same) He receives mail just fine normally, but anytime e-mails are sent to t hese 2 DL's, no dice. Any ideas on where and how to begin to troubleshoot this would be greatly appreciated ? I really would like to refrain from having to send "test" e-mails to all staff in hopes of resolving this, but at this point, I'd really like to get to the bottom of the issue. Thanks, Harry.
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
