Schema extensions are typically less risky than raising functional levels, IMO..
-sc From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: running exchange 2010 on windows 2008 vs. windows 2008 r2 I am already a much bigger fan of 2008 R2 than 2008 R1 for the same reasons. I'm just exceedingly hacked off that a) I can't install Citrix XenApp Server 5.0 on 2008 R2, meaning that I have to maintain some 2008 servers for the moment, and b) that I can't summon up the guts to upgrade my AD schema to 2008 R2 because I'm paranoid that it will fsck something in Exchange 2007 2009/12/9 Jason Gurtz <[email protected]> > And just in general - my experience is that 2008 r2 feels "snappier" than > 2008. But that's subjective. Makes sense: 2008 => Vista tree 2008R2 => Win 7 tree I'm wondering if I could upgrade a 2008 box to R2 underneath MS DPM 2007; something tells me that would be an exceptionally bad idea. Cheers, ~JasonG -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." http://raythestray.blogspot.com
