Well, I decided to trust you.....and everything is still working. Cheers :-)
2009/12/9 Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> > Don’t hold off because of Exchange. It will work fine. It’s supported. The > current technet articles will be updated during the next refresh. > > > > Trust me. J > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael B. Smith > > Exchange MVP & Owner: The Essential Exchange > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael > > > > *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2009 10:00 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: running exchange 2010 on windows 2008 vs. windows 2008 r2 > > > > I am already a much bigger fan of 2008 R2 than 2008 R1 for the same > reasons. I'm just exceedingly hacked off that a) I can't install Citrix > XenApp Server 5.0 on 2008 R2, meaning that I have to maintain some 2008 > servers for the moment, and b) that I can't summon up the guts to upgrade my > AD schema to 2008 R2 because I'm paranoid that it will fsck something in > Exchange 2007 > > 2009/12/9 Jason Gurtz <[email protected]> > > > And just in general - my experience is that 2008 r2 feels "snappier" > than > > 2008. But that's subjective. > > Makes sense: > > 2008 => Vista tree > 2008R2 => Win 7 tree > > I'm wondering if I could upgrade a 2008 box to R2 underneath MS DPM 2007; > something tells me that would be an exceptionally bad idea. > > Cheers, > > ~JasonG > > > > > -- > "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into > the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able > rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such > a question." > > http://raythestray.blogspot.com > -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."
