Specific load balancer or just a shedload of mappings? From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 02 February 2012 11:23 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers?
I'll say now that we don't use static ports. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> On Behalf Of Steve Goodman Sent: 02 February 2012 11:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers? I don't think there is a particular downside. When the US wakes up I am sure Michael may have a different take, but assigning a static port avoids having to load balance a large number of TCP/IP ports for RPC. In essence to set static ports it's just a couple of registry entries on each server that's part of the array hosting the CAS role. Steve From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[email protected]]<mailto:[mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: 02 February 2012 11:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers? And to balance RPC I guess I'm back where I started with the docs from loadbalancer.org stating you need to assign a static RPC port? Any downside in doing so? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
