Every Enterprise level customer I do Citrix work for uses RPC/HTTP for their Exchange stuff.
Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com<http://www.carlwebster.com/> From: Michael Smith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: Admin Issues <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:07:41 +0000 To: Admin Issues <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers? You pays your money, you takes your chances. I see a lot of investment over the last few years at Microsoft going into RPC/HTTP technologies and none into RPC/TCP. RPC/HTTP on the LAN is very common. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Load Balancer vs. 2 more Exchange Servers? So what is the pro of that approach over doing LB for RPC too? Keeping in mind I’m trying to avoid client disruption if/when we do this? I’d assumed, incorrectly probably, that using RPC over HTTP on the LAN isn’t all that common? If nothing else it makes a big difference in the level and cost of LB required. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
