On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
>> ----
>> diff --git a/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
>> b/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
>> index a62b960..5d3f775 100644
>> --- a/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
>> +++ b/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
>> @@ -24,19 +24,20 @@ src_install() {
>> mkdir -p "${D}/etc/env.d/binutils"
>>
>> insinto /etc/env.d/binutils
>> - cat <<EOF > binutils.env
>> -TARGET="${CHOST}"
>> -VER="${PV}"
>> -LIBPATH="/usr/lib/binutils/${CHOST}-${PV}"
>> -FAKE_TARGETS="${CHOST}"
>> -EOF
>> + cat <<-" EOF" > binutils.env
>> + TARGET="${CHOST}"
>> + VER="${PV}"
>> + LIBPATH="/usr/lib/binutils/${CHOST}-${PV}"
>> + FAKE_TARGETS="${CHOST}"
>> + EOF
> [...]
>
> Doesn't this create blanks at each line of binutils.env?
>
> IMO the old version was better, because the file in the filesystem looks
> cleaner.
>
Doesn't really matter imo. I plan on redoing all the toolchain
slotting completely anyway and there's a good chance it'll change
quite a bit when I do that.
Regards,
Bryan Østergaard
_______________________________________________
Exherbo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
