On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 07:38:44AM +0200, Markus Rothe wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> > ----
> > diff --git a/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
> > b/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
> > index a62b960..5d3f775 100644
> > --- a/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
> > +++ b/packages/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.18-r2.exheres-0
> > @@ -24,19 +24,20 @@ src_install() {
> > mkdir -p "${D}/etc/env.d/binutils"
> >
> > insinto /etc/env.d/binutils
> > - cat <<EOF > binutils.env
> > -TARGET="${CHOST}"
> > -VER="${PV}"
> > -LIBPATH="/usr/lib/binutils/${CHOST}-${PV}"
> > -FAKE_TARGETS="${CHOST}"
> > -EOF
> > + cat <<-" EOF" > binutils.env
> > + TARGET="${CHOST}"
> > + VER="${PV}"
> > + LIBPATH="/usr/lib/binutils/${CHOST}-${PV}"
> > + FAKE_TARGETS="${CHOST}"
> > + EOF
> [...]
>
> Doesn't this create blanks at each line of binutils.env?
>
> IMO the old version was better, because the file in the filesystem looks
> cleaner.
>
> Regards,
>
> -markus
It does, and that's ugly.
I've reverted the patch in ec26353, thanks!
_______________________________________________
Exherbo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
