On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:16:44 +0100 > Bryan Østergaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> My vote would be for moving on with this idea and seeing how it'll >> work out in practice. Any (good) reasons we shouldn't go on with this? > > Well... We still need to work out the on-disk layout. > I'm aware of that but the basic idea should be fine imo. Lets see how some suggestions would look like for our current repositories.
Some quick numbers from the repositories I happen to have installed on my laptop currently: (numbers represent packages in that repository) arbor:394 alsa:6 ciaranm:8 ferdy:8 hardware:8 ingmar:47 kde:58 media:67 mozilla:4 perl:117 rbrown:21 scientific:8 spbecker:2 tanderson:11 texlive:3 x11:316 gnome:83 compnerd:61 office:9 So the biggest repositories we have atm is arbor with almost 400 packages and x11 with 316 packages. And most repositories are about 100 packages or even less. Repositories like perl might get a lot bigger in the future of course unless we create a magic CPANRepository. Best Regards, Bryan Østergaard _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
