On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 08:02:38PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > If it is 'last': > > packages/ > -none-/ > o/ > foo/ for /foo > r/ > bar/ for /bar > z/ > baz/ for /baz > ruby/ > d/ > STUPID/ for ruby/STUPID > f/ > foo/ for ruby/foo > y/ > monkey++/ for ruby/monkey++
Is the (performance) benefit of 'last' over 'first' really worth making it slightly less obvious where a package resides? -- Exherbo KDE, X.org maintainer _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
