I'm +1 to ad emacs and not remove vim. If someone not needs vim - remove it not very hard job.
2014-05-03 14:54 GMT+04:00 Wulf C. Krueger <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > we've had vim in the stages for a long time. For those of us and our > users who don't use vim but Emacs, this has been a nuisance. > > Thus, I'd like to add Emacs to the stages set so that both editors > will be available to everyone from the start. Having both of the major > editors will ensure that whoever comes to Exherbo will have his > favourite editor around to use and feel right at home. > > Adding Emacs adds about 30 MB to the stages but I don't think this is > a major issue these days. > > > In private discussions, the proposal to remove vim, not add Emacs and > instead add nano to the stages came up. I don't think this would be > very useful since it would alienate basically everyone. > > - -- > Best regards, Wulf > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlNkytMACgkQnuVXRcSi+5qcmwCdEr7NnYqKf47dZLsneYbKz3ad > ENQAoI0Q/jRFKPBO7X7lM6D3Md94Ma/6 > =e1V5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Exherbo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
