Like I mentioned in the past, I am able to provide the hosting on my own VPS server. In fact, I have a gitlab instance that can be used for Exherbo users. I am willing to host Gitlab for Exherbo users for my own good will. I've been running this server for few years now, and I can assure you that uptime will be longer. Please take my suggestion into consideration -- it seems that I am always ignored when I contribute to Exherbo community.
Thanks! On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Exherbo-dev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Exherbo-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: GitLab (Marc-Antoine Perennou) > 2. Re: To Gerrit or not to Gerrit ... (Wulf C. Krueger) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:39:21 +0100 > From: Marc-Antoine Perennou <[email protected]> > To: Niels Ole Salscheider <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Exherbo-dev] GitLab > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=cp932 > > For what it's worth, we could host a gitlab instance on Clever Cloud for > free (I already manage several instances so one more is not that big of a > deal). > > > > > > On 30 Jan 2017, at 22:28, Niels Ole Salscheider < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > there have been some discussions on this list and on IRC about using > GitLab > > for code reviews. > > If we want to do this we have two options: We can either host a GitLab > > instance on our own or use gitlab.com. The advantage of the latter is > that it > > is much less work while we would have more control with the former > > alternative. > > > > If we decide to use gitlab.com we still want to have the official > repositories > > on exherbo.org. But automatic two-way syncing seems to be problematic. > > This could be solved by forbidding to push to the official > repositories?all > > commits would have to go through gitlab.com and would then be pushed to > the > > official repositories. > > > > What do you think about this solution? > > > > GitLab also includes a CI service that can run arbitrary docker images. > We > > should be able to use this to test commits. It's not clear yet if we can > use > > the gitlab.com runners or if we would have to set up our own since our > testing > > would require a bit more computing power. But if we can use them that > would be > > an additional benefit. GitLab CI also integrates nicely into the review > > process. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Ole > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Exherbo-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:10:12 +0100 > From: "Wulf C. Krueger" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Exherbo-dev] To Gerrit or not to Gerrit ... > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Hello, > > I do realise I'm ever so slightly late... ;-) > > On 12/18/16 20:03, [email protected] wrote: > > Wulf: I am not trying to step on your work, let me know if you think it > > should be done otherwise > > Everything's fine, Kim. :-) > (In fact, you shouldn't even have felt compelled to write that line but > I know perfectly well why you did and I'm sorry.) > > > I'm going to try and fix Gerrit but > > a) I'm not making any promises this time (did before, couldn't deliver), > b) I'm not sure I *can* fix it without starting from scratch (and I > don't really want to do that if I can avoid it) > c) I'm open to other solutions (be they self-hosted or somewhere else, > F/OSS or not (albeit preferring F/OSS)) > > -- > Best regards, Wulf > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 213 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: <http://lists.exherbo.org/pipermail/exherbo-dev/ > attachments/20170131/9dbe8eff/attachment-0001.asc> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Exherbo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Exherbo-dev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 1 > ******************************************* >
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
