Hello, > In my view, part of our trouble is having too much rotting stuff. I > see that ::haskell shows 517 packages here, but our users only care > about gch, pandoc and git-annex (I also use postgrest, but we never > packaged it and I'm not in a hurry).
Yeah, interest in ::haskell seems to be very limited from most core devs (including me, I don't know any haskell, so I can't exactly review it). Forking the repository to get it into a working state first and then making one (gigantic) MR to ::haskell doesn't sound like a bad idea - unless some other core dev is interested in bringing ::haskell up to speed? > It's only after burying these undead that we can start rewriting > exlibs and exheres and maybe designing a cabal repo format, all geared > toward satisfying the user's use cases raised in this thread. +1 for burying what's not required anymore. If someone does happen to need one of those packages (and somehow used it until now even with ::haskell's current state) reviving that package should be an easy task. - Rasmus "Cogitri" Thomsen _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
