On 6/9/05 1:41 AM, "Philip Hazel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Your suggestion of making auto_thaw not apply to bounces is an
> interesting one, and given that we now have ignore_bounce_errors_after,
> it makes a lot of sense (and gets back to the original kinds of
> reasoning for the existence of auto_thaw). I am strongly tempted to
> implement it. What do other people think?

Good change, I think.

(But then, our config file is such that it won't make any difference, so
that's easy to say.)

  --John



-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details 
at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to