Andrew Johnson wrote: > I 100% agree, but the servers connecting to our relay are in some cases > badly configured, out of date with patching and just plain old.
I understand that, I've been long enough in this business. I just wanted to know with which servers the behaviour described by you happens. > This patch was to provide a cleaner fix rather than the less elegant bogus > authenticator with a name of "\r\n250-AUTH=" You wrote that the bogus authenticator didn't fix the behaviour, so this wouldn't be a question of elegance. Applying non-trivial patches is far less elegant than a little config change. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
